|
In order to qualify for a National Interest
Waiver:
-
The candidate must be a professional
holding an advanced degree or be of exceptional ability; and,
-
The work of the candidate must be in the
National Interest.
As the labor certification
process is designed to address labor shortages, shortage of labor is not
enough to justify a waiver of the labor certification process.
Standards for determining what is in the
national interest have changed. Determination of what is in the
national interested is governed by a case titled In Re: New York
Department of Transportation, Interim Decision (AAU) 3363, 1998.
This case held that in evaluating a candidate's prospective benefit:
The USCIS must consider whether the candidate's "past record justifies
projections of future benefits to the national interest" through a
three-part test.
-
Whether the candidate seeks to work in an area of "substantial
intrinsic merit"
-
Whether the benefit of the candidate's proposed activity will
be "national in scope" (benefit to more than a particular
region of the country as well as little or no adverse impact on
the interests of other regions of the country).
-
Whether the candidate "will serve the national interest to a
substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker
having the same minimum qualifications" (a track record of
success with some degree of influence on the field as a whole
including evidence from unbiased proponents and solid
documentation of past success rather than expectation of future
success).
By the third
prong of the test, candidates for a
'national interest' waiver are required to meet an even more demanding
standard than candidates asserting exceptional ability who need to their
work is of prospective national benefit and expertise significantly above
that ordinarily encountered in the field.
Unfortunately,
the statutory authority to exercise flexibility has seemingly been
exceeded by a narrowed definition of national interest.
Eligibility has thus narrowed and the standard has become the equivalent
to the extraordinary ability standard. Still, creative advocacy is invited
as the USCIS has stated its commitment to "leave the application of this
test as flexible as possible" and judging each case "on its own merits."
|